Or is it a "free enterprise" system where each player gets paid a different amount.
Universities bring in hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to their athletic programs each year.
Why can't hundreds of millions of dollars be directed into those, and in turn make money much more accessible to athletes for the kinds of regular day-to-day expenses regular college students pay by working jobs that are off-limits to intercollegiate athletes.
They can wait a couple of years until they become professionals to make hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. How could you pay college football players but not baseball players or members of the women's field hockey team.
So I don't want to hear that it's "unfair" to pay the quarterback of Alabama more than all the sociology students in the undergraduate college.
The point of this is that a scholarship doesn't equal cash in a player's pocket. And how in the world would you pay men in a way that wouldn't violate Title IX. The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of dollars to the member institutions.
Would the quality of the broadcasts or the coverage or the staging of the events be somehow diminished. Leave a comment and debate your position. Most profits from college athletics do not go towards academics.
Yes, pay would vary, just as the universities with the more successful teams receive more television time or money than those with less successful teams.
College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. For example, some less popular teams like swimming, tennis, or volleyball don't earn the university much money, and the bigger sports like basketball and football make up for the lost revenue. But how much do the top NCAA executives make. Whether student-athletes should be paid is an ongoing debate often brought up during championship seasons, especially the college football playoffs and the basketball post-season.
If a car dealer wants to strike that deal then good for the player in question. The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students -- employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law.
You know what that's called. Yet, no player can benefit from that work.
Universities bring in hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to their athletic programs each year. Because so many athletic departments run at a deficit, it's difficult to make the case that schools should pay regular salaries to athletes, even football players who produce more income than anybody.
Tuition, room, board and books were compensation enough. If a school makes a huge scientific achievement, they will be in the newspaper for a few days. If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. Would athletes be paid differently depending on the sport they play.
Instead, they go to the coaches, athletic directors, and some administrators, reports Edelman. Why hasn't anything changed. The student-musician is no less a college student because he struck a lucrative deal. That, in turn, can deprive other students of their chance to gain the education and experience at the college of their dreams, since their desired program will no longer be offered, says Anderson.
Whether student-athletes should be paid is an ongoing debate often brought up during championship seasons, especially the college football playoffs and the basketball post-season. Where would the money even come from. Players Are Getting National Exposure Almost all of the games that are played in the bigger conferences are broadcast on national or regional television.
This is an NBA rule but has a huge impact on the game of college basketball.
If the athletes were already getting paid and they enjoy college, they would probably be less likely to turn pro after 1 year. However, once the season started up, he couldn't work that job anymore.
The debate over whether student-athletes should be paid could go on and on. At first, it was a great place to watch athletes play sports while making sure the rules were being followed.
Student-athletes do not need to receive huge salaries like their coaches; rather, they could still be paid a reasonable amount relative to how much the program makes.
Third, the athletic programs. Do all athletes get the same amount of money across the board. College Athletes Getting Paid?. The question, “Should college athletes be paid?” is re-hashed regularly. There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university.
The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. Jan 30, · When the NCAA was first founded inthe opposition to paying student-athletes was akin to the opposition to paying coaches.
(If you doubt this, research early criticism of Alonzo Stagg). But, coaches today get paid, and handsomely too. Essay about Why College Athletes Should be Paid Words 9 Pages Why College Athletes should be Paid Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics.
Some people think that if the players can bargain over their working conditions, they will want to be paid, just as professional athletes are.
And this may change college sports forever. Dec 18, · While scholarship players do get their meals paid for while they are on the road and also in the on-campus dining halls, often times the athletes are either in practice or studying to have time to visit the dining halls while they are janettravellmd.coms: 5.Should college athletes get paid for